क्रिप्टोक्यूरेंसी - क्रांतिकारी प्रौद्योगिकी के यूरोपीय संघ और डच कानूनी पहलू - छवि

क्रिप्टोक्यूरेंसी: यूरोपीय संघ और डच कानूनी पहलू…

क्रिप्टोक्यूरेंसी: रिवोल्यूशनरी टेक्नोलॉजी के यूरोपीय संघ और डच कानूनी पहलू


The worldwide growth and increasing popularity of cryptocurrency has led to questions about the regulatory aspects of this new financial phenomenon. Virtual currencies are exclusively digital and organized through a network known as a blockchain, which is an online ledger which keeps a secure record of each transaction all in one place. No one controls the blockchain, because these chains are decentralized across every computer that has a Bitcoin wallet. This means no single institution controls the network, which naturally implies the existence of many financial and legal risks.

Blockchain startups have embraced Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) as a way to raise early capital. An ICO is an offering whereby a company can sell digital tokens to the public in order to fund operations and meet other business objectives.[XNUMX] Also ICOs are not governed by specific regulations or government agencies. This lack of regulation has raised concern about the potential risks investors run. As a result, volatility has become a concern. Unfortunately, if an investor loses funds during this process, they have no standardized course of action to recover the lost money.

यूरोपीय स्तर पर आभासी मुद्राएँ

The risks associated with the use of virtual currency raise the need of the European Union and its institutions to regulate. However, regulation at European Union level is quite complex, due to the changing EU regulatory frameworks and regulatory inconsistencies across member states.

As for now virtual currencies are not regulated at EU-level and are not closely supervised or overseen by any EU public authority, even though participation in these schemes exposes users to credit, liquidity, operational and legal risks. This means national authorities need to consider whether they intend to acknowledge or formalize and regulate cryptocurrency.

नीदरलैंड में आभासी मुद्राएँ

According to the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (FSA) electronic money represents a monetary value that is stored electronically or magnetically. This monetary value is intended to be used to perform payment transactions and can be used to make payments to other parties than the one that issued the electronic money.[XNUMX] Virtual currencies cannot be defined as electronic money, because not all legal criteria are met. If cryptocurrency cannot be legally defined as money or electronic money, as what can it be defined? In the context of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act cryptocurrency is just a medium of exchange. Everyone has the freedom to engage in barter trade, therefore permission in the form of a license is not required. The Minister of Finance indicated that the revision of the formal legal definition of electronic money is not yet desirable, given the bitcoin’s limited scope, relatively low level of acceptance, and limited relationship to the real economy. He emphasized that the consumer is solely responsible for their use.[XNUMX]

According to the Dutch District Court (Overijssel) and the Dutch Minister of Finance a virtual currency, such as Bitcoin, has the status of a medium of exchange.[XNUMX] In appeal the Dutch Court considered that bitcoins can be qualified as sold objects as referred to in article XNUMX:XNUMX DCC. The Dutch Court of Appeal also stated that bitcoins cannot be qualified as legal tender but only as a medium of exchange. In contrast, the European Court of Justice ruled that bitcoins should be treated as a means of payment, indirectly suggesting bitcoins are similar to legal tender.[XNUMX]


Due to the complexity which involves the regulation of cryptocurrencies, it can be assumed that the Court of Justice of the EU will have to be involved in the clarification of terminology. In case of the Member States that have chosen to adapt the terminology differently from the EU legislation, the difficulties may arise in connection with interpretation in line with the EU legislation. From this perspective, it is necessary to recommend to the Member States that they follow the EU legislation terminology while implementing the legislation into the national law.

इस श्वेत पत्र का पूरा संस्करण इस लिंक के माध्यम से उपलब्ध है।

संपर्क करें

यदि आपके पास इस लेख को पढ़ने के बाद कोई प्रश्न या टिप्पणी है, तो कृपया एमआर से संपर्क करने के लिए स्वतंत्र महसूस करें। मैक्सिम होदक, अटॉर्नी-एट-लॉ एट Law & More के माध्यम से [ईमेल संरक्षित], या श्री। टॉम Meevis, अटॉर्नी-एट-लॉ एट Law & More के माध्यम से [ईमेल संरक्षित], या +31 (0) 40-3690680 पर कॉल करें।

[१] सी। बोवार्ड, आईसीओ बनाम आईपीओ: क्या अंतर है ?, बिटकॉइन मार्केट जर्नल सितम्बर २०१ov

[२] वित्तीय पर्यवेक्षण अधिनियम, धारा १: १

[XNUMX] Ministerie van फाइनानिक, बीन्टोवॉइडिंग वैन केमर्व्रजेन ओवर हीट गेब्रिक वैन एन टोज़िच्ट ओप न्युवे डिजिटेल बीटलमिडेलन ज़ोल्स डी बिटकॉइन, 2013।

[४] ECLI: NL: RBOVE: २०१४: २६६I।

[५] ईसीएलआई: यूरोपीय संघ: सी: २०१५: I१I

गोपनीयता सेटिंग्स
हम अपनी वेबसाइट का उपयोग करते समय आपके अनुभव को बढ़ाने के लिए कुकीज़ का उपयोग करते हैं। यदि आप किसी ब्राउज़र के माध्यम से हमारी सेवाओं का उपयोग कर रहे हैं तो आप अपनी वेब ब्राउज़र सेटिंग्स के माध्यम से कुकीज़ को प्रतिबंधित, ब्लॉक या हटा सकते हैं। हम तृतीय पक्षों की सामग्री और स्क्रिप्ट का भी उपयोग करते हैं जो ट्रैकिंग तकनीकों का उपयोग कर सकते हैं। आप इस तरह के तीसरे पक्ष के एम्बेड की अनुमति देने के लिए नीचे चुनिंदा रूप से अपनी सहमति प्रदान कर सकते हैं। हमारे द्वारा उपयोग की जाने वाली कुकीज़, हमारे द्वारा एकत्र किए जाने वाले डेटा और हम उन्हें कैसे संसाधित करते हैं, इसके बारे में पूरी जानकारी के लिए, कृपया हमारी जाँच करें निजता नीति
Law & More B.V.